Osteopathy uses hands-on techniques to restore the body to health.
Usually Osteopaths treat problems of the musculoskeletal system - pain and disability arising from the joints and muscles of the body, sometimes as the result of particular injuries or disease, but more often as the result of the day to day stress on our bodies derived from the things we do and the effects of gravity and our own postures upon us.
In fact Osteopathy was originally developed to be a complete method of medicine (see section History of Osteopathy). As modern medicine has developed, many areas, such as heart disease and many cancers, can be effectively tackled by conventional methods - but not all. How many patients are familiar with being told “there is nothing wrong with you” when they know there is something wrong, though a diagnosis has not been found. In these cases, an Osteopath can often look at a patient and suggest why the shape of their body, or the stiffness of particular joints, may lead to the problems they suffer. For example, a patient with a curved thoracic spine and immobile rib joints, could be expected to have difficulty breathing and, perhaps, recurrent chest infections.
So, Osteopaths use their hands to decrease muscle tension and, stretch out joint restrictions, so that the patient’s body moves better, their blood and other body fluids flow better, their organs function better and they feel better with less pain. Not all bodies can be made perfect, but nearly everyone gains some ease of pain and some improvement in physical ability as a result of treatment.
If you want to know more about the techniques involved, and what to expect if you come for treatment, see the section What is treatment like?
Touch is an underrated sense, yet it is a very valuable means of finding out what has gone wrong in the body.
The osteopathic philosophy stresses the interconnections within the body, the way that one part affects another or the way that you move differently in response to pain or after an injury.
But we also value conventional medicine and applaud its many great strengths. If we think that you need conventional treatment or tests, at any stage, we will recommend that you return to your G.P.
In this section we aim to give you a better idea of how we work and who we are able to help.
The strength of Osteopathy lies in treating an individual as unique.
In every case we consider a patient as a person, in the context of their own physique and lifestyle, within the particular demands that their work and home-life place upon them.
All ages can benefit from Osteopathy. Babies can treated using gentle "cranial osteopathic" techniques.
Older children too can benefit from postural advice and help with strains suffered during growth spurts (see section Osteopathy for babies and children).
Many of our patients are adults of working age. Those undertaking heavy physical work (we see many builders and cleaners) could be expected to suffer strain and back pain from time to time, but sitting at a VDU all day or driving long distances can also lead to back pain, and problems such as various forms of repetitive strain injuries and headaches.
Elderly people can also benefit from Osteopathy and are often surprised that the stiffest joints can become more mobile and aching limbs eased. Research undertaken by the University of Sheffield* in which our practice took part, demonstrated that older patients who have other underlying ill-health problems (such as diabetes or respiratory disease) could, nevertheless, gain significant benefit from osteopathic treatment for their musculoskeletal problems.
Nobody’s problem is ever dismissed as something they must learn to live with at their age! Even those who have had symptoms for a long time (2 years or more) can do well.
Osteopathy is, of course, not a cure-all. If an Osteopath feels s/he cannot help in an individual case, s/he will say so. Every patient is re-assessed at each subsequent appointment and if either the Osteopath or the patient does not feel adequate benefit is being achieved, this will be discussed, treatment altered or curtailed, or further medical investigations requested.
Please feel free to discuss any concerns you may have with your Osteopath at any time.
However, the majority of patients do benefit from Osteopathy. The same research team from Sheffield* found high levels of patient satisfaction at the end of treatment and when followed-up 4 months later. Moreover, our own practice audit results suggest that patients perceive improvement quite quickly, usually within 1 - 4 treatment sessions, although full benefit may take longer.
* “GP-based Purchasing of Osteopathy and Chiropractic; an Evaluation of a Pilot Scheme 1996-1998” - Medical Care Research Unit, University of Sheffield.
If you come for treatment with one of the Fishponds Osteopaths, what can you expect?
The Osteopath will meet you in the Reception area, and take you to an individual treatment room - but already the process of diagnosis has begun: could you get up from the chair without pain? could you speak clearly? did you limp? The Osteopath will ask you to sit down (if you are comfortable to do so) and will ask you lots of questions - basic admin’ details to begin with, but then more probing questions about your particular problem, about your lifestyle and the activities you undertake, and also about any health problems you have had in the past which may affect the way your body works today.
The Osteopath will then ask you to undress - usually down to your underwear. It is very important in Osteopathic diagnosis to look at the patient in full, to see their overall shape and what movement they can achieve. For example, a feature as small as a fallen arch on one foot may result in torsion through one leg, twisting in the pelvis, curvature through the spine and neck muscles which are working so hard to hold the head level that headaches result. (If you are concerned about the need to undress, you are always welcome to bring a friend or relative with you, or a chaperone can be provided within the practice on request).
The Osteopath may then want to see particular movements in more detail - perhaps carrying out a thorough examination of your hip or shoulder, and will also want to feel the tissues. Osteopaths have been described as having thinking fingers. Palpation, (the sense of touch), is essential to feel the overall range of mobility at a spinal joint, but also its quality, and the condition of the surrounding muscles. All this information enables an osteopath to form a picture of their patient as a whole, suggest what may be going wrong, and how improvement could be made.
Except in the most complex cases, treatment will be commenced at the first visit, once the Osteopath has discussed his/her findings with the patient and what needs to be done (Initial examination and treatment may take up to any hour, with follow-up visits lasting 30 minutes). At Fishponds Osteopaths we strive to use the very gentlest techniques that will achieve the required results. Rhythmic articulation of the joints will often be done, gentle stretching or massage of tight muscles undertaken, or the very gentlest “cranial” osteopathic techniques used in which patients are aware of little more than the Osteopath holding the appropriate area of the body.
Sometimes more vigorous techniques are advised - these are the manipulations which cause a joint to click or deep, soft tissue work to release shortened muscles. Even these are not usually painful - although they may be if a patient has a lot of severe inflammation present. Manipulation will always be discussed with a patient, but it can be highly effective in restoring movement to a locked joint with rapid relief of associated pain. Feedback from patients about how they are feeling during treatment is encouraged.
After treatment, a patient will be reassessed and any appropriate advice given such as changes to be made in seating at work, or exercises to be done. A further visit is almost always necessary - to check progress and make sure that balance has been restored to the body. In many cases a course of treatment is necessary to gain the required improvement. A few patients, whose pattern of dysfunction has become set in with their occupation or age, may require treatment at regular intervals to sustain improvements in the way they feel and function.
Case Histories 1
Trevor
... is 70 years old and is keen on bowls, which he had played all his life until he developed pain in his low back and buttock last year. It was clear from examining him that he had considerable osteoarthritis (the “wear and tear” type of arthritis) in his low back, making him very stiff. He thought this was something he would just have to live with and meant the end of his bowling career. In fact, after 2 treatment sessions, he felt better than he had done for years and he has resumed bowls. He needs treatment to keep him “loosened up” from time to time.
Barbara
... is a 58 year old hairdresser, who developed upper back and right shoulder pain so severe that she could not do her job. Examination demonstrated that she had become very round-shouldered over the years, so that her shoulder joints could no longer function in their proper alignment, making tasks like blow-drying very difficult. Her attempts to continue with her job despite the pain – most hairdressers are self-employed and cannot afford time off – led to further strains through her neck and at the joints where her ribs meet her breast bone.
When treatment began her body felt very brittle, as if it would snap if too much pressure were applied. Treatment could only, therefore, proceed gently and slowly. Gradually the pain began to recede and she became better able to do her job. After a while her body felt much more flexible, and Barbara needed only top-up treatment sessions every few months. After about a year, she became independent of treatment and keeps herself flexible and less round-shouldered with exercises prescribed by her Osteopath.
Sarah-Jane
... is the mother of 2 little girls and works in an office part-time. 2 years ago she suffered a “whiplash” injury in a road traffic accident, which led to strains through her neck and upper back. She also developed severe headaches.
Although Sarah-Jane underwent a course of Physiotherapy, her pain did not fully resolve and her headaches became more frequent. Examination showed that she still had a locked joint in her neck. Manipulation of this joint quickly improved its movement and her symptoms resolved very quickly. She has not had any headaches since treatment.
Tina
... began to develop pain to the left of her mid-back, which became so bad that it made her vomit. Examination showed that she had a marked curvature of her spine (“scoliosis”) causing muscle imbalance which tightened up even more when she came under a lot stress at work. The nerves which come from the spine at the back of the chest control sub-conscious functions and, when they are irritated by inflammation at the joints nearby, symptoms such as sickness can occur.
Although treatment cannot get rid of a congenital anomaly like scoliosis, it can make the affected joints move much more easily and relieve the inflammation putting pressure on the nerves. Treatment rapidly eased Tina’s pain and she stopped being sick. She also sought to change her own life by finding a new job which she now thoroughly enjoys.
Frances
... has a very deeply arched lumbar spine. Most of the time the spine has enough adjustability in it that this kind of anomaly causes no problems, but if some mild strain, for example, occurs, the muscles will tighten and exaggerate the arch which already exists. This puts considerable pressure on the lowest joints of the back which, in Frances’ case, became inflamed and painful.
Osteopathic treatment to stretch out these joints and advice to encourage Frances to stand with better tension through her abdominal muscles, rapidly relieved her symptoms.
Maggie
... came to the practice having suffered 6 months of severe back pain, radiating into her abdomen. She had had scans of her abdomen through her GP, which showed a cyst on one ovary. This was thought to be the cause of the pain and was removed by surgery, but the pain was unchanged.
When she came to the Fishponds Practice she could not straighten up and could not bear her own weight (though she was of slight build). She was referred privately for X ray of her spine which showed that one vertebra had collapsed and suggested a much more serious problem. In this case osteopathic treatment would not be useful and Maggie was referred back to her GP, with full information about the spinal fracture, for further investigations and appropriate treatment
Case Histories 2
Sylvia
... is a 32 year old teacher with a long history of back pain originating from a car accident twenty years earlier. When I first saw her she was ten weeks pregnant and experiencing such bad mid and low back pain that sleep was becoming difficult.
Treatment began using gentle cranial techniques to release the pelvic area and a combination of mobilisation and manipulation to restore movement to the mid back. These areas improved rapidly, but her neck became stiff, as her posture began to adapt to the growing size of the baby. This area also responded rapidly to treatment. Further maintenance treatment to keep her spine mobile may be advised as the pregnancy progresses. A lot can be done to ease back and neck pain in pregnant women.
David
... is a sporty 10 year old boy who has suffered from chronic asthma from the age of one year. In his early years he had a couple of very severe attacks. Also as a younger child he suffered from chronic ear infections.
Having had a moderate attack just a few months ago, David was very afraid of having a recurrence. Clearly osteopathy cannot cure asthma, but I believe it can help, often quite a lot. David had quite severe cranial tightness, and some tightness in his upper back and ribs. Treatment began by releasing the spine and ribs to improve the mechanics of breathing. Then over several treatments the cranial tightness was reversed. It certainly seemed to help and David gradually became less apprehensive about his asthma
Patrick
... is a 45 year old accountant who was experiencing intermittent headaches which were becoming more frequent. His headaches had been worse since he fell onto his back and head five years previously. When experiencing a headache the pain was mainly located on the right at the back and side of his head. He had some difficulty in turning his neck to the right. A one-sided restriction in neck rotation is often a useful clue that the upper part of the neck is not working properly. Problems in this area can frequently cause headaches.
Tests confirmed that the movement of the upper part of the neck was abnormally reduced and manipulative treatment rapidly restored it to 90% of normal. His headaches improved, being less frequent and less severe. Further treatment to release the cranial movement at the back of his head helped to improve the headaches even more. Not surprisingly given his work, Patrick needs to return for follow up treatment about twice a year.
Steve
... is a 52 year old businessman and keen golfer. In recent weeks the nagging pain which he “just put up with” in his lower back had become worse and he had stopped playing golf.
Despite a history of arthritis in his left knee and mild psoriasis, his pain did not seem to be arthritic in origin. His back had become very tight and this was worse in the low back on the left. Mobilisation and manipulation of his mid and low back soon began to restore some of the lost motion (so essential for golf). Soon he was able to play nine holes, then a full eighteen. Then he relapsed and in addition to further treatment I advised some stretches to do at home and some postural advice about home and car. This seemed to help and though Steve may have to accept that he is not 30, he is playing a full round again.
Carmen
... was a 25 year old mum who has suffered from persistent pain since a very serious car accident the previous year. Her neck and upper back were constantly stiff and painful. She experienced frequent generalised headaches, poor memory, poor concentration, lack of focus and tiredness. The cranial movement was very disrupted and it felt as though her body was fighting itself, pulling in different directions, possibly from the magnitude of the forces which acted on her body in the accident.
Treatment began with the release of this deep physical conflict. Initially after this session Carmen became very emotional and her low back felt very sore. Then after a few days she felt more relaxed. Further treatment began to release the tightening of her back and neck – each stage produced a strong emotional reaction and frequent tears as the physical effects of the accident held in her body began to release. After several weeks her back and neck were improved though still occasionally stiff. Her concentration and energy levels were improving and she clearly felt more able to engage with the world again.
John
... came to the practice complaining of pain in his low back and through the front of his right thigh. It was very clear from examination that his hip joint was badly affected by osteoarthritis and so he was advised to return to his GP to seek referral to an Orthopaedic Surgeon for hip replacement.
Waiting lists for this operation on the NHS are very long and so, a year later, John is still coming to the practice on a regular basis. Osteopathy helps to keep his hip joint as mobile as possible and, in so doing, relieves his pain and keeps him going.
However it still makes a lot of sense to discuss some subject areas in more detail and to look at the specific concepts involved.
In a sense Osteopaths are trying to hold the middle ground between the strongly reductionist approach, that looks only at local symptoms and the strongly holistic approach that insists on a broad perspective, even when it is not that useful.
All the osteopaths in our practice will take a broad and holistic view of each patient they see. However, Osteopaths are individuals too, and, over the years, find certain areas of treatment are of particular interest to them.
In this section we outline the various areas in which each of us has a special interest.
Osteopaths have specialised in diagnostic touch from the start of the profession. We use the sense of touch, informed by our knowledge of anatomy, to work out if any areas of the body or movements of the joint feel tighter or more restricted than they should.
With the movement of joints in the arm, leg or spine this is fairly obvious. However, following the pioneering work of W.G. Sutherland, osteopathy began to focus on subtle rythmic movements palpable most easily within the cranium, but also present throughout the body. Sutherland‘s concepts are widely practiced and many osteopaths are convinced that cranial osteopathy is a very useful, safe and effective way of helping babies and children as well as adults.
The method has been controversial from the start, both within the osteopathic community and more widely. This controversy does not centre around issues of safety; even its detractors believe the approach to be safe, but concerns the lack of formal research based evidence for its effectiveness.
Many osteopaths around the world believe that in due course correctly designed and applied research will show dramatic results in favour of this method.
Many people think Osteopaths only treat low back pain - this is not the case by any means. We can help patients with all sorts of problems arising from the musculoskeletal system. Nevertheless, it is an area where Osteopathy is particularly effective and probably about half of our patients first come seeking help for low back pain.
It is often said that "80 per cent of back strains get better within 8 weeks, regardless of any treatment" (see "The Times", Body and Soul supplement, 17 January 2004). But who can afford to be incapacitated with low back pain for 8 weeks, and what about the other 20 per cent who cannot get better by themselves?
Diagnosis of the problem is the key to success in treating patients with low back pain, as there are a multitude of variables which contribute to the condition. In the first instance, care must be taken to spot any serious disease giving rise to the patient's pain, but, in most cases, low back pain makes life wretched, but is not life-threatening.
The lumbar spine is a complicated area, where damage to structures such as intervetebral discs, ligaments, tendons and muscles, with or without the involvement of nerve roots giving referred pain elsewhere, must all be considered. Some well-known causes of back pain are:-
Intervertebral disc damage
This is the so-called "slipped disc" - even though it doesn't slip anywhere. The disc is the shock absorbing pad which lies between each bone of the spine. Think of it as being a bit like a doughnut, with a gooey, liquid substance - the "nucleus pulposus" - in the middle, surrounded by rings of tougher fibres ("anular fibres"), and all encapsulated within a skin around the outside. In a so-called "slipped disc" - more correctly "herniated" or "prolapsed" disc, the tough rings of fibres develop a fissure or tear, allowing the liquid in the middle to seep outwards - a process which may well take years. The process is not painful because there are no nerves in the centre of a disc. Only when the liquid reaches the outer part of the disc, and causes a bulge within its skin, does it give back pain. As you may imagine, getting to the painful stage is often the 'last straw' in a process which has been going on for a long time - thus patients often feel they have done little or nothing to warrant such severe pain. If the process goes a step further, and the liquid bursts out of its skin, it may well hit a nerve root and pain will be felt acording to the area that nerve root supplies. At this stage the patient may well have raging leg pain ("sciatica", as it is often the sciatic nerve which is compressed).
Osteopathy can do much to reduce the abnormal compression of a disc and to relieve the pressure of a disc protrusion on nerve roots. If, however, the problem does not begin to resolve quite rapidly, or signs of nerve root compression are becoming worse, the Osteopath will refer you back to your General Practitioner, and surgery may, in a few cases, be necessary.
Facet Joint Locking or Strain
The spine is a segmental structure, permitting considerable flexibility. At every level there are two small joints. If a joint moves too far, or movement is poorly controlled by the muscles, a joint may strain or even lock, giving sudden, severe back pain. The back muscles may go in to spasm and movement becomes almost impossible. This problem can be quite frightening, but can be very simple for an Osteopath to sort out, by manipulating a joint so that its mobility is restored, the muscle spasm eases, and the pain goes as soon as any inflammation present has subsided.
However, patients problems are often more complicated than the paragraphs above suggest. It is more common for a combination of structures to be involved - say a facet joint lock, together with strain of the surrounding ligaments which try to support the spine. There may also be irritation of a nerve root emerging close to the joint, which then sends messages to the muscle group it supplies to over-contract, givng cramp-like symptoms. An Osteopath must also be looking for the underlying causes of the problem. For example, a disc may have become abnormally worn, and eventually prolapse, because another area of the back is too stiff and does not carry out its share of movement - this may be for reasons associated with the posture one has learned over the years, or even problems of development back in one's teenage years (known as osteochondritis of the spine or Scheurmann's Disease).
Stiffness and inflexibility of the spine are a common cause of recurring low back strain and pain. This may in part be genetic, it may be to do with previous damage to the area causing the ligaments and muscles to become shortened and tight, or may be to do with arthritic (degenerative) changes in the spine. Arthritis (sometimes called spondylitis) in the spinal joints, associated with abnormal or early wear, commonly causes significant stiffness and this decreased flexibility often leads to recurrent strains in the back. The resulting pain can, however, by successfully treated by Osteopathy, and mobility exercises will often help. Arthritis of the spine rarely leads to significant disablity, and patients who have been given this diagnosis should not be unduly worried (talk to an Osteopath about it!).
Over-flexibility or instability of the spine can give rise to just as many problems. Many patients will remember being very gymnastic as a child, but, over the years, leaving physical activity behind them as the demands of daily life required more and more time. People like this often have rather elastic ligaments, permitting a big range of movement at joints, which is a bonus whilst the muscular strength is there to support the spine. But if activity decreases, adequate muscular support may also be lost, and repeated back injuries may result.
Research over the last few years has focussed more attention on sufferers of long-standing (chronic) or recurrent back pain and its causes. It has been found that patients like this often have an imbalance in the strength of the deep muscles of the back ("multifidus"), which stabilise one bone on another, and the longer, more superficial muscles (Erector Spinae"), which bring about the big movements of the spine. Correct co-ordination between the two may also be lost, so that the stability of one bone on top of another is poorly controlled, whilst the spine as a whole is being moved about - resulting in injury and further loss of strength in Multifidus and co-ordination. Rehabilitative exercise, such as Pilates, can be very useful in addressing this kind of damaging imbalance.
The causes - or rather the combination of causes which adds up to low back pain - are so varied - as varied as people themselves. In addition to considering tissue damage, an Osteopath must also consider a patient's ability to heal - do they, for example, suffer from other pathologies such as Diabetes which makes recovery less rapid, - the occupation they are undertaking, the physical demands of their home-life, their emotional stress which can affect the state of their muscles, and so on and so forth - the list is almost endless. This is why an Osteopath needs to take such a detailed history and undertake a thorough examination of the patient in the first instance, but also needs to re-evaluate and explore a patient's structure more thoroughly at each treatment session, adapting trreatment if necessary as changes begin to occur.
Cranial osteopathy can be very useful for adults as well as children.
Overall mobility is reducing throughout adulthood, both in the limbs and spine, and more extensively in the head (cranium). Despite the finding that the gaps between the many cranial bones (sutures) can tend to close over or fuse as we age, osteopaths believe tiny amounts of movement are preserved due to the slight flexibility of living bone.
Because of this gradual reduction in cranial movement we believe that headaches can become more likely or more severe and persistent symptoms after a head injury may be more likely.
A full case history of symptoms and medical history is taken. The osteopath will often be surprisingly interested in injuries that happened a long time ago; even birth trauma can be relevant at any age.
If appropriate, the examination commences and includes much of the mobility and postural assessment and observation that is common to any osteopathic assessment. What is different is the use of light touch, which feels like being cradled in the hands to identify areas of tightness in the body and in particular the head.
Treatment consists of a similarly light but more directed touch to begin to restore motion where possible.
After treatment adults may initially feel a little ‘light headed’. It is very rarely a problem as long as they are warned that it may happen. Another common reaction is to be slightly more sleepy afterwards and that same night. Again this is rarely a problem as long as patients are warned.
In adults the response to treatment is slower and more treatments may be required than in children. The osteopath will try to give some idea of how many treatments it is reasonable to try and agree to review the situation at the end of the course of treatment.
When a woman first hears that she is pregnant the birth can seem a very long time away. But those months will be packed with events as the baby grows and the mother’s body changes.
Osteopathy places a great emphasis upon how the body copes with the demands that life and posture place upon it. This means that osteopathy is an excellent treatment to have throughout the pregnancy.
So what is an Osteopath looking for when a woman comes for a check up early in her pregnancy, or even before she is actually pregnant?
We are essentially checking her musculoskeletal system, (her joints and muscles), to see if they are in good shape for the demands of the pregnancy and labour.
We are looking at her posture, gently palpating and moving her body to see if everything is mobile and relaxed.
We focus particularly upon the low back and pelvis, but the hips and the rest of the body are important as well.
As her posture changes during the pregnancy, due to the increasing size and weight of the baby and of course hormonal influences, the most important thing is simply to keep up!
The best time to discover that you have an area of tightness in the back, or an area that isn’t working as well as it should, may be before you are pregnant, or at least early on. It certainly isn’t good to find out late in the pregnancy with an episode of back or pelvic pain.
Though as Osteopaths we are well used to treating and helping women who have back and pelvic pain ‘out of the blue’ during pregnancy, we are keen to see women early and try to prevent problems.
There are no safety concerns about treating women during pregnancy, but even so we take extra care to make our treatment as gentle and careful as possible, particularly during the early weeks of the pregnancy when spontaneous miscarriage is more likely.
After the pregnancy we are keen to check the mother, (and of course the baby or babies), to help her body to get back to normal as soon as possible. If we are needed and mother or baby cannot travel, perhaps being confined to home or hospital, we will visit.
Whilst little formal scientific research has been undertaken into the effectiveness of osteopathy in childhood, the improvements we see in our young patients leaves us in no doubt that it can provide huge benefits.
Very light touch is used to identify any areas of tension and tightness in the body which can originate from birth or subsequent injuries or illnesses, and which can cause babies to become very distressed..
A similar light touch is used to correct these disturbances, though as children develop, some gentle techniques similar to those used with adults may be used. When treating babies, very light touch is used to identify areas of tightness or tension in the baby’s body.
If the treating Osteopath is concerned that there is a more serious problem going on, he/she will, of course, refer the baby back to their GP for conventional medical investigations.
Martyn Morgan is happy to talk to parents in advance to advise whether osteopathy is likely to be helpful in individual cases. (Tel: 0117 949 1290).
“Osteopathy” is the culmination of many centuries of development in manual therapy - it has much in common with the ancient arts of bone-setting, and many therapists from diverse cultures around the world practice “manipulation” to help ease their patients pain and discomfort.
In its present form , Osteopathy was developed by Andrew Taylor Still, a doctor of the time , in Missouri, USA, in the 1870s. He himself lost his own four children, and found the medicine he was practising powerless to help them. He looked around for something better, using his knowledge of treatment modalities as diverse as bone-setting and mesmerism (a fore-runner of hypnotherapy), to evolve “Osteopathy”.
Dr Still originally intended osteopathy to be a complete model of medicine - for use with all kinds of patients and diseases. As conventional modern medicine has developed, better ways of tackling many problems, such as infection and cancer, have been found, but Osteopathy remains the forerunner in the treatment of problems of the musculoskeletal system, and where, even now, modern medicine has little or nothing to offer (see sections What is Osteopathy? and Who can we help?) .
In developing Osteopathy, Andrew Taylor Still , who was also a Methodist preacher, had a vision of mankind as perfectly formed in God’s own image. Only where man deviated from that perfect form or function could problems arise. Dr Still found that, by using his hands, an Osteopath could seek to regain the working of the body as an ideal mechanism to restore health. In working to make joints mobile,improve curved backs or bowed knees, and soften muscles so that the blood can flow freely, Osteopaths still work with this image of the perfect body in mind.
The first college of Osteopathy was founded by Dr Still in Kirksville, Missouri. Graduates from this College soon began to take their knowledge, founding other colleges, throughout the USA; a few even found their way across the Atlantic, including one, Martin Littlejohn, who founded the British School of Osteopathy, in London in the early 1920s. Two of our Osteopaths graduated from this college, which celebrated its centenary in 2017 and now has University status in its own right; now known as the University College of Osteopathy.
Dr Still also trained W G Sutherland, whose particular interest in the movements of the joints of the skull, led to the development of “cranial Osteopathy” - all our Osteopaths are trained in these methods and Martyn Morgan and Nina Hurrell specialise in their use particularly with babies and children; see sections The Osteopaths - qualifications and specialties and Osteopathy for babies and children.
Osteopaths are regulated under the Osteopaths Act (1993) and were the first complementary medical profession to achieve statutory self regulation.The profession is regulated by the General Osteopathic Council, (GOsC), www.osteopathy.org.uk, who administer the act with regard to the education, registration and conduct of all osteopaths.
All osteopaths in this practice are registered with the GOsC.
One of the benefits of the Osteopaths Act (1993), is that the title "Osteopath" is itself protected by law and only those registered with the GOsC may call themselves an Osteopath.
The GOsC, in common with the registering bodies of other professions, such as medicine or dentistry, has a responsibility to protect the public and has a number of legal powers in order to do this. It has the power to consider cases where it is alleged that an osteopath has behaved in an unacceptible or incompetent way, has a criminal record, or is unable to practice because of their mental or physical health.
Whilst most problems about the sort of service received or the osteopaths behaviour are misunderstandings that can be resolved locally by contacting the osteopath directly, the GOsC is there to listen to any compaints members of the public may have and to advise on the best course of action. Any complaint will first be investigated and if it is decided that there is a case to answer, the matter will be referred to the Professional Conduct committee (PCC) or to the Health Committee (HC).
It may then be decided that a hearing is required. This is a formal meeting, similar to a courtroom, where the committee listens to both sides and comes to a decision. PCC hearings are held in public and HC hearings are held privately. If it is decided that the allegations are true the GOsC has the power to suspend an osteopath from practice, or impose suitable conditions upon any further practice. In the most serious of cases they can stop the person from practicing as an osteopath by removing their name from the register.
This much may be, more or less, what you would expect! But the GOsC's code of practice does put a number of very positive points and rather than just saying what will happen if things go wrong, it also tells osteopaths what their responsibities are to make sure that things go right.
For example as an osteopath you must:
- Put your patients first.
- Foster and maintain trust between you and your patients.
- Listen to patients and respect their views.
- Give patients the information they need to be sure they understand you.
- Respect and protect confidential information.
- Respect patients autonomy and freedom to make their own choices.
- Maintain and develop your professional knowledge and skills.
- Practice within your professional competence.
- Never abuse your professional position.
- Respect the skills of other health care professionals and work in cooperation with them.
- Respond promptly and consructively to criicism and complaints.
- Act quickly if you believe that a colleagues conduct, health or professional performance - or your own - may pose a threat to patients.
This last point is particularly interesting. As you can see it means that osteopaths are obliged to act as "whistleblowers" concerning both our colleagues and ourselves.
For further information about the work of the GOsC, or to view a database of osteopaths registered with them, visit (www.osteopathy.org.uk), or telephone 020 7357 6655.
One of the most important functions of the General Osteopathic Council (GOsC) is to evaluate the content and standards of the courses which train osteopaths.
Historically courses which trained osteopaths awarded the qualification DO or diploma in osteopathy. However with the advent of statutory self regulation in the mid 1990's, most graduates were awarded a BsC(hons) or BsC degree by the Universities to which the independent Colleges of Osteopathy were affiliated. In 2017, the British School of Osteopathy as accredited as a University in its own right. Its students graduate with a Master of Osteopathy Degree (M.OST) in recognition of the strong research element within their course.
As there was considered no practical way of evaluating past courses, when the Osteopaths Act, (1993), was enforced in the late 1990's all osteopaths in practice at that time were subjected to a detailed examination of their knowledge and competence. There was no 'grandfather clause' under the Act, whereby existing practitioners might go through automatically onto the new register. Any who did not meet the required standards were examined in more detail and submitted for retraining and mentoring. Some, of course, were eventually rejected.
Since then the only route to becoming an osteopath and to be registered with the GOsC is to successfully complete an approved course providing a recognised qualification.
Some elements of the courses on offer today are very similar to those DO courses, many of which were of a very high standard. Yet the change to statutory self regulation has created much greater security for the osteopathic colleges and far greater opportunities to collaborate with universities and other academic institutions. This does seem to have resulted in a raising of standards in some areas of the courses as best practice in the rest of the academic world has been adopted.
Whilst anatomy, physiology, pathology, diagnosis, nutrition, biomechanics and all the other subjects that an osteopath needs to know are still on the curriculum, there is now a much greater emphasis on research skills. This is both by producing pieces of research and by being able to interpret and make use of professional and scientific literature. {Play}
Historically courses tended to consist of four years of full time study and this is still true at: The British School of Osteopathy, (BSO): http://www.bso.ac.uk/ The European School of Osteopathy, (ESO: ) http://www.eso.ac.uk The British College Of Oseopathic Medicine, (BCOM), http//:www.bcno.ac.uk has just introduced a five year full time course.